|
|
Revitalization Program of Floral Garden in Kromeriz
Sitařová, Dagmar ; Suchánek, Radek (referee) ; Jura, Pavel (advisor)
My projekt is trying to notice the formal and geometric philosophy of the Floral garden. Together wants to keep the significancy and function of its current entry object, which is an important and presentable element. The solution comes from the context of surroundings and its history in en effort to honour and support these conditions. Project is focused on a restoration and new functional use of current historical buildings, architectonic solution of parts of histirocal gardens and design new objects.
|
|
|
Revitalization Program of Floral Garden in Kromeriz
Jursa, Adam ; Jura, Pavel (referee) ; Ponešová, Barbora (advisor)
Revitalization of Floral Garden in Kromeriz was the aim of my project. Not only a form and a traffic, but its functional content as well. Floral garden was built in the 17th century by bishop Castelcorn and became a UNESCO heritage in 1998. I struggle to preserve original division of a front part of the Floral Garden. Its ideological meaning is original as well. It stays discrete, differs from the Floral Garden not only in form but in function as well. The front part of the garden is divided into three parts. One of them became a filter between organism of a city and strict Renaissance garden.
|
|
|
Revitalization Program of Floral Garden in Kromeriz
Vaculovičová, Vanda ; Mutina, Petr (referee) ; Jura, Pavel (advisor)
Subject of bachelor project is urban and architectural design of adjustment and annex part of garden called Holland and Orange garden in close neighborhood of formal part of baroque Floral garden in Kromeriz (registered on UNESCO list of world heritage). New building is inspired by green walls in main part of Floral garden. There are visitors' centre, gallery, library and café inside. New building contrasts to entrance building "Cestny dvur" because of its form and used materials at the same time. Thanks to that it doesn't change character of the place dramatically, but tries to complete it suitably instead.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Revitalization Program of Floral Garden in Kromeriz
Guzdek, Adam ; Šupler, Libor (referee) ; Jura, Pavel (advisor)
Today's entrance through honorable courtyard is so representative that there's no sense of replacing it by a new one anywhere else. The entrance object has a triangular tympanum including Maxmilian Josef's gold signature and coat of arms. It looks like noble city palace of that period. Sense of the first floor, so called piano nobile, is slightly recognizing on a facade. It's the floor with a larger high that's intended for representation. Therefore I decided to use the historical object fully and all the visitors' equipment, exhibition and lecture spaces are placed right here. New-buildings in the garden are minimized that way. I conceived both of the resolving gardens very sparingly. The reason is their historical essence. Always they were only related to the formal part of the Flower garden. Premises used for any purpose (breeding of rare birds, resource for rabbit hill, growing tulips and oranges). Květnice with the cut lane walls to allow the visitor facilities and provide some exciting long-distance views Converging walls, disorientation in space, entertainment in the bowling alley, in the maze. These elements should remain a formal part of the garden today. They should be isolated and without competition. I design gardens with order, as well as the designed Libosad itself.
|
|
|
Revitalization Program of Floral Garden in Kromeriz
Dvořáková, Terezie ; Herzán, Radovan (referee) ; Ruller, Ivan (advisor)
After studying the historic concept of the garden I began to thik about the urban conception of the current entrance. I thought about the renewal of the original entrance through the colonade directly on the axis of the rotunda. This entrance is nowdays impossible to restore because of the contiguous road which doesn’t permit to create a new entrance space for the new visitors center. Another reason is that th garden is today a part of the city organism and its direct connection to the city center is from the east side where the current entrance from the half of the 19th century lies. I tried to find a different possibility of the entrance so it would go with the baroque symetric conception of the garden and also it would have a connection to the city center. There should be also enough space for building a new visitors center. All these conditions are included in the new entrance which is placed directly to the axis of the rotunda from the east side of the city center. To this side is also orientated the porticus of the rotunda from the break of the 19th and 20th century.
|
|
|
Revitalization Program of Floral Garden in Kromeriz
Urbánková, Eva ; Palacký, Jiří (referee) ; Ponešová, Barbora (advisor)
The proposition gets down to the garden reverently and submissively, it honoures the historical side and also tries to renovate the repressed principles of the garden - the axial symetry. The nature of the proposition is to take visitors to the fareland, they can inform themselves about history there, the profunndity sense of the garden and then they are ready to enter a mannerist - baroque gem. The garden can use its philosophical qualities now - to lead visitors up in his heart. Or it can grip of its secret and shows, which are hidden in the "rooms" of the garden. This proposition completes the garden technically too, for safeguarding adequate comfort for visitors.
|
|
|
Revitalization Program of Floral Garden in Kromeriz
Dvořáková, Terezie ; Herzán, Radovan (referee) ; Ruller, Ivan (advisor)
After studying the historic concept of the garden I began to thik about the urban conception of the current entrance. I thought about the renewal of the original entrance through the colonade directly on the axis of the rotunda. This entrance is nowdays impossible to restore because of the contiguous road which doesn’t permit to create a new entrance space for the new visitors center. Another reason is that th garden is today a part of the city organism and its direct connection to the city center is from the east side where the current entrance from the half of the 19th century lies. I tried to find a different possibility of the entrance so it would go with the baroque symetric conception of the garden and also it would have a connection to the city center. There should be also enough space for building a new visitors center. All these conditions are included in the new entrance which is placed directly to the axis of the rotunda from the east side of the city center. To this side is also orientated the porticus of the rotunda from the break of the 19th and 20th century.
|
guest ::
